Christians are told to submit to their government in Romans 13 which says, “Let everyone be subject to the governing authorities, for there is no authority except that which God has established,” because the authorities have been placed into power by God.
There is only one reason that Christians are given which would allow them to disobey their government.
When government violates Scripture (Acts 5:29) then Christians are told they must follow God’s law.
Seems simple enough, right?
That’s not always the case.
California business owners may soon find themselves in a situation where they are forced to choose between God’s law, state law, federal law or a combination of the three.
Rumors are circulating that Tom Homan, acting director of U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) will be conducting raids in Northern California following his statement earlier this month that, “California better hold on tight… If the politicians in California don’t want to protect their communities, then ICE will.”
Homan made the statement after California passed legislation that “officially” makes it a “sanctuary state.”
Governor Jerry Brown who signed the “sanctuary state” bill into law in October without a vote from the citizens of California, said “These are uncertain times for undocumented Californians and their families, and this bill strikes a balance that will protect public safety, while bringing a measure of comfort to those families who are now living in fear everyday.”
Now California Attorney General Xavier Becerra is relaying on additional new state legislation to warn employers within California that if raids occur, employers had better not assist ICE agents in tracking down those wanted in the immigration sweeps.
Citing the “Immigrant Worker Protection Act” that became state law in January and seeks to prevent all workers, regardless of immigration status, from being detained at workplaces, Becerra reminded employers of their legal responsibilities under the law and the consequences for failure to follow it.
The Act requires:
▪Employers to ask immigration agents for a warrant before granting access to a worksite.
▪Prevents employers from voluntarily sharing confidential employee information without a subpoena.
▪Requires employers to notify their workers before a federal audit of employee records.
▪Gives the attorney general and labor commissioner exclusive authority to enforce new provisions of state labor laws.
▪ Prohibits employers from re-verifying information on employment verification forms, unless compelled to by federal law.
Becerra warned that failure to follow the law will mean businesses will face repercussions including fines of up to $10,000, if they assist ICE agents during an immigration crackdown.
Becerra said during a recent news conference in the state’s capital, “It’s important, given these rumors that are out there, to let people know – more specifically today, employers – that if they voluntarily start giving up information about their employees or access to their employees in ways that contradict our new California laws, they subject themselves to actions by my office. We will prosecute those who violate the law.”
There is a problem with Becerra’s directive to California business owners, however.
California’s newly enacted law “protecting” immigrants in California may violate the U.S. Constitution and the Supremacy Clause.
The U.S. Supreme Court has “ruled that the federal government has broad and exclusive power to regulate immigration, preempting state and local laws that also attempt to do so.”
The U.S. Constitution grants Congress the exclusive right to legislate in the area of immigration.
In addition, “The Supremacy Clause of the United States Constitution (Article VI, Clause 2) establishes that the Constitution, federal laws made pursuant to it, and treaties made under its authority, constitute the supreme law of the land. … Even state constitutions are subordinate to federal law.”
Given the fact that California’s state law and the federal law on immigration may contradict each other, which law should business owners follow in keeping with God’s commandment to submit to government authority?
Should businesses follow federal law because it’s the supreme law of the land?
If you answer, yes, remember there has been no ruling by the U.S. Supreme Court that California’s state law violates federal immigration law or the Supremacy Clause.
It’s possible that relying on federal law and disobeying California law could potentially prove financially and legally disastrous, at least in the short-term.
It’s a complicated situation at best that puts the business owner squarely in the middle.
Travis Allen, a Republican candidate for California governor recently told business owners in California what he believes they should do.
Allen said during an interview last week, “Attorney General Xavier Becerra’s warnings of prosecution and fines for voluntarily cooperating with the U.S. government were so egregious that federal officials should consider bringing charges of their own against the Democratic official.”
“To have the attorney general of California use California businesses as pawns in his ongoing war with the White House is not just wrong, it’s illegal.” “This is textbook criminal obstruction of justice and he should be prosecuted by the U.S. Department of Justice,” Allen stated.
Whether upcoming raids will occur is not clear but given Homan’s strong statements to California, immigration sweeps may take place sooner than later.
In the meantime, business owners are caught in the middle of political grandstanding with no clear resolution in sight.
© 2018, admin. The Logo and Photos (by Susan Knowles) are protected by U.S. Copyright Laws, and are not to be downloaded or reproduced in any way without the written permission of Susan J. Knowles. Copyright 2014 Susan J. Knowles All Rights Reserved.